Polls are funny.
I remember the weekend before Michigan's gubernatorial election back in 1990. My boss, Jim Blanchard, the incumbent, was 20 points ahead of his challenger, John Engler, the frumpy, dumpy right wing Senate Majority Leader.
Jim Blanchard |
That was when I learned that polls don’t necessarily mean sh*t. It’s all about GOTV, “Get Out the Vote,” and Blanchard hadn’t done it. So while he headed to a lucrative post at a high-falutin’ law firm, then a presidential appointment as U.S. Ambassador to Canada, scores of mid-level staffers like me scrambled and lamented the fact that we hadn’t burrowed into holes in state government like some had recommended. (We refused to acknowledge the Blanchard Fatigue that existed in the field, choosing instead, unwisely, to hang our hats on the results of a single poll.)
John Engler |
So I can’t decide how I feel about yesterday’s news that 62 percent of those polled by the Lansing firm EPIC-MRA disapprove of Republican Rick Snyder’s performance as governor, up from 57 percent in July. (Back in January, Snyder’s favorable to unfavorable spread was 59 percent to 8 percent.)
Rick Snyder |
When asked about his poll numbers, Snyder insisted that the personal meetings he has with residents suggest the public is more supportive than the surveys say. This is the equivalent of sticking one’s fingers in one’s ears and singing, “La la la” really loudly.
I want to hang my hat on these numbers because I strongly dislike the Nasally Nerd and believe his “Rob from the Poor to Give to the Rich” policies are as bad for Michigan as John Engler’s were two decades ago. (At least with John Engler, Lansing observers knew what we were in for. Snyder is more of an enigma, a secret that proves uglier and worse as more is revealed.) But the next election is still more than 56 weeks away; a lot can change in that amount of time.
Let’s see what happens on Election Day.
No comments:
Post a Comment